Fitting Out Offices: Traditional Route vs Design & Build

We are often asked to advise Clients on which is the best procurement route for them to take in the fit out stage of a project.

We have listed below some of the pros and cons of the two routes:

Design & Build
  • Can be quicker than traditional if time is very tight
  • Less opportunity for conflict between Contractor and Designer
  • One stop shop principle is offered but not always fulfilled
  • Generally difficult to compare like for like costs and thereby difficult to demonstrate value for money
  • Significantly more expensive than traditional, as Design & Build Contractors generally have higher overheads.

Traditional Route

  • The Client has control over the design from the outset with no hidden agenda
  • Contractors bid on a like for like basis so the lowest cost can be achieved and value clearly demonstrated
  • Can take longer than Design & Build
  • Potential for conflict between Contractor and Designer if not properly managed.

If you would like any further advice on the above, please contact Simon Wood on 020 7953 7638.

 

This is a test